Print Response papers A response paper is a short essay which conveys the writer's reaction to one or several texts that he or she has read.
A instance of product tampering resulted in syringes being found in cans of Pepsi. Ina clerk for a Steinberg grocery store in eastern Ontario discovered something in a Pepsi bottle he at first mistook for a straw.
A closer examination revealed the item to be a syringe, and the bottle was rescued from the shelf before it fell into the hands of a consumer.
The Gbs response paper 1 pepsi and was turned over to store management, who in turn brought it to the attention of Health and Welfare Canada. Health and Welfare Canada launched an investigation into the incident, and although they ultimately achieved no official resolution of the case, they reasoned the likely culprit was a disgruntled employee of the bottler, EastCan Beverages of Ottawa, Ontario.
The incident was not repeated; no more syringes turned up in any other bottles. In an eerie way, that find was the precursor to the Pepsi syringe panic.
Once again, hypodermic needles and this particular brand of cola met up, but this time the confluence of the two was pyrotechnic. In the space of two days in Junenews stories about finds of syringe-laden cans of Pepsi swept the USA.
For a short time it looked like a widespread instance of product tampering was underway. The first report came on 9 June from an year-old man in Tacoma, Washington, who said he looked into a can of Diet Pepsi to see if he had won a prize and found a syringe.
He had not noticed the hypodermic when he poured himself a drink from the can; he found the needle the next day. Soon afterwards, similar reports flooded in from all over the USA. At least 52 reports of tampering in at least 23 states were ultimately made before this scare ran its course.
Those looking for a quick buck reasoned it would be terribly easy to coax a little money out of Pepsi by claiming to have found needles in their drinks. With so many real finds turning up, the company would be quick to pay off anyone who stood in line — or so the con artists thought.
What they failed to realize was that all the finds with the exception of the first were bogus, and so they were all trying to pull the same scam as everyone else.
No plausible explanation for that first find ever came to light. The needle discovered by the elderly Tacoma couple was bent in the manner responsible insulin users are taught to leave a used syringe, and discarding such an implement in a soda can is a disposal method favored by many who have to regularly give themselves injections.
There was a further puzzling fact: Once Pepsi and the FDA was sure they knew what was going on, Pepsi launched an all-out campaign to reassure alarmed customers who dreaded getting stuck by needles secreted in their drinks.
Officials at bottling plants threw open their doors to the press, demonstrating how it was virtually impossible to place an object in a can, and pointing out that even if that were accomplished, the tampered can would be easy to detect. In Pepsi was producing 2, cans a minute at plants on high-speed canning lines in which cans were inverted, shot with a blast of air or water, and then turned right side up and filled.
Since the cans were open for only nine-tenths of a second, someone would have had to be awful quick to get a syringe into any of them. The company took out ads in twelve national newspapers, and bottlers ran notices in to local dailies telling readers that the stories about Pepsi were a hoax.
Ultimately, the Federal Bureau of Investigation made twenty bunko arrests of people who had planted syringes or other objects in their drinks, and many other would-be claimants who had less seriously dabbled with making false claims against Pepsi recanted their stories.
Some complainants were obviously pranksters, while others seemed to be trying to cash in on spurious injury claims. A few seemed only to want the attention of the news media — a paltry kind of fame, but apparently sufficient for some to want to seek it.
Media coverage, denials, arrests — Pepsi fought the rumors of product tampering as actively and publicly as it was possible to fight them. Yet was it enough? Needle-find hysteria in was nothing compared to what it would be now, when every found hypodermic is presumed to be laden with the AIDS virus, but even so Pepsi will long be remembered as the soft drink with a syringe.
The bell of rumor could not be unrung, even had the media cooperated. As Gail de Vos points out in her Tales, Rumors, and Gossip, accounts of obvious post-purchase can tampering never came close to achieving the same level of prominence in the press as accounts of the original horrifying find did.
As an example, she cites coverage by The Edmonton Journal, which was typical of how many news outlets handled resolution of this news story: This escalates the problem of an increasingly hysterical public:History Pepsi Cola and Coca Cola has been in the cola wars for centuries now.
It erupted 13 years after the birth of Coca Cola by pharmacist Caleb Bradham, when Pepsi Cola was created. This made the two cola producers a direct competitor with one another.
Over the decades after the creation of the. Watch video · The Microsoft Security Response Center is part of the defender community and on the front line of security response evolution.
For over twenty years, we have been engaged with security researchers working to protect customers and the broader ecosystem. 1.
Rifts laid bare as G20 summit opens. 2. Marriott hack hits million guests. 3 'I have a nose, a mouth and can smile again' 4. Trump defends Russia business links.
5. Sustainable procurement: the GBS for paper and paper products Official Government Buying Standards (GBS) for office paper and envelopes: bleaching, recycled content, mill broke content. Mar 05, · Check relevant reaction paper guidelines to learn that the length of your summary should be only 1/3 of the paragraph.
Do the same with other points. When writing academic assignments in this format, you need to have 3 and more points to analyze and respond in 4/4(85).
Case Study Coke and Pepsi 1. Identify the ongoing issues in this case with respect to issues management, crisis management, global business ethics, and stakeholder management.
Rank order these in terms of their priorities for Coca-Cola and for PepsiCo.